![]() Clarity on Corporate Structure: first and foremost, the #1 problem with this proxy investment is that we have two corporations with effectively two co-CEOs. Let's talk about the problems of a proxy investment in this particular case and the critical importance of a corporate restructuring:ġ. In fact, many disciplined investors actually have a rule that they never invest in a proxy. I've interviewed dozens of high net worth investors including three hedge fund managers. I also warned that there was one significant caveat: investing via proxy. In my original bullish article, I wrote about the four pillars of a great investment: Brand, Industry, Management, and Moat. The subscriber count continues to grow rapidly while the company brings on revenue sharing partners far sooner than I would have ever expected. By all accounts, the math of the business model is going as I always thought it would with 2.6 movies per month seen on average in Q4 and probably somewhere between 2.1 to 2.3 movies in Q1. MoviePass is a $10B to $50B opportunity that will require at least a $1B capital investment. Below is my take on what's really going on with HMNY and MoviePass.Īs I previously wrote about, I suggested that the math of the business model should not be a concern at this time. The stock first settled in around $4.50 after that offering but then more recently has spiraled downward with no end in sight. UPDATE: MoviePass' stock closed at 0.048 USD on Wednesday afternoon.It has been a long difficult slide for Helios & Matheson Analytics ( OTC:HMNY) since its most recent $105M financing. In the meantime, to follow the MoviePass parent company share price, use the HMNY Stock Ticker Symbol. Last week MoviePass CEO told the NYPost that "investors believe in the sustainability of MoviePass' new pricing plan, but are waiting to see what percentage of the service's 3-million-plus subscribers renew at the three-movies-per-month rate."Īs more is learned about the future of MoviePass, we'll continue to update this post. "These factors raise substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern."Īccording to CNN, the company recently underwent a reverse 250-to-1 stock split in hopes of boosting share price and avoiding being delisted from the NASDAQ. "Without additional funding, the company will not have sufficient funds to meet its obligations within one year," Helios said in its report. Helios and Matheson issued a statement earlier this month claiming talk of the company's demise was "greatly exaggerated" and that it was just going through a "rough patch." But in Tuesday's earnings report, there was less of the positivity found in earlier statements. The parent company's stock continued to fall Wednesday morning, with shares dipping below four cents. The changes to the plan lead to a mass exodus of users, some of whom later found out their plans were reactivated when they accepted the new Terms of Service for MoviePass. Unfortunately, many subscribers reported having choices limited to just one or two film options per day, with more popular films only showing vacancies during strange hours. This change may have been acceptable had moviegoers actually been able to find seats. In addition, the company has recently made numerous changes to its business model, the latest of which involved altering the terms of service to allow users to see one movie per day to just three movies a month for $9.95. MoviePass has been in hot water for a while now, with shareholders filing suit against the company for alleged fraudulent business practices. The fall in share prices came after a tumultuous day for the company as Helios and Matheson (HMNY), the owner of the subscription movie service, posted its latest earnings report, showing a $126.6 million loss in the second quarter. MoviePass' stock took a massive dive this week, as shares plummeted to five cents Tuesday afternoon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |